<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Globalization &#8211; CJSelvamani</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cjselvamani.com/tag/globalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cjselvamani.com</link>
	<description>Saved by Gracious Faith Alone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Globalization and Changing Culture</title>
		<link>https://cjselvamani.com/globalization-and-changing-culture/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cjselvamani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2019 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Worldview and Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture is Changing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cjselvamani.com/?p=289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[According to Brian and Jenell “Though all globalization is a cultural change, not cultural change [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>According to Brian and Jenell “Though all globalization is a cultural change, not cultural change comes from globalization.” (P.204) It is surprising to know that globalization is not a twentieth-century concept since it existed from the time of the Great Alexander (around 350 BCE). Later, the Arab and Muslim empire (around 700 CE) expanded it further into most regions of Asia, Europe, and Africa. The contemporary globalization “is distinct, however, in its scope, rapid rate of development, and subsequent cultural consequences.” (P.204) Today, globalization influences almost everyone on the planet earth, previously in the ancient period, it served the elites mostly. In today’s England, the most famous cuisine is curry and the famous beverage is tea. In India, once elite English’s sport cricket dominates, most importantly, BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) is the wealthiest cricket association in the world. Some say BCCI semi-commands the ICC (International Cricket Council) on its decision-making process. </p>



<p>Globalization changes people’s lives today all around the world in their
thinking and lifestyle. In other words, culture is getting changed by
globalization. New technologies in the transport medium and communication
systems shrink the globe in the way of traveling time and interaction. Today,
it is possible to reach London from Bangalore in ten hours. Many universities
offer online programs, even it was unthinkable in a human’s mind three decades
back. Internet availability changes the traditional way of learning, a decade
back, it was mostly pursed by going to the university or school campus. Now,
the story is changing. An Indian kid can acquire a Cambridge model school
education from India and Westerners able to watch multicast of an Indian
spiritual guru over the online media.</p>



<p>The Culture in which we live is <em>changing constantly</em> whether we choose
it or not. The experiences among me, my father and my grandfather are not exactly
the same. Probably, there is a common layout among us when all three of us
lived under one roof. It has never been the same again once I left home for university
education. I was transitioning from a village life from southern Tamilnadu to a
Chennai city life. The life in the university enabled me to meet people from
all over India, especially, the language of communication mostly happened in
English, formerly, it was in Tamil. There was a sudden exposure to different
foods, transport system, music, and dressing codes. Overall, it was a
mouth-watering experience during the first year.</p>



<p>“Culture is the comprehensive and integrated complex of ideas, feelings
and values, and the associated patterns of learned behavior and products that
characterize a particular society.” In my sophomore year, I was able to
recognize the jokes which were thrown at me in the first year since I was
carrying a characteristic of the society. It changed rapidly when I started to
work, particularly during my years in western Europe. How work and faith have
seen separately in the secular West. But in India, the case was different.
Always, I enjoyed the work with my personal faith. However, life in the west
created opportunities to meet people from various country backgrounds. It was
always a learning experience to know something from a different culture.</p>



<p>Moreover, “globalization is the integration of local, regional, and/or
national production, exchange, and culture into a global system.” (P.205) I
remember going to a Tesco supermarket in the United Kingdom (UK), most of the
products’ origin on the shelf were not from the UK. Especially, among the
vegetables’ lane, ninety percent of the produces were imported goods. In India,
items like sausages, burger patties, and steaks are not alien anymore.</p>



<p>The three theories on globalization will clarify globalization at its
best level. First, <em>modernization</em> <em>theory</em> “teaches that all
societies move through stages of economic, political, and cultural development
toward becoming industrialized, democratic, and ‘modern’ societies.” (P.207)
Besides, it suggests that colonized countries are the most benefited party on
this subject. But the western countries’ economic growth with industrialization
after World Wars I and II did not create societies with “advanced” moral sense.
Most importantly, many former colonial countries kept their poverty status
unchanged, globalization did no impact on them.</p>



<p>Second, <em>the dependency theory</em> reasons that “the movement of
global resources creates permanent relationships of economic dependence between
industrial and nonindustrial nations.” (P.208) It is also moving the nation’s
system from agricultural to the production mode which creates dependency among
countries and encourages economic growth. On the one hand, the dependency
theory creates wealth among formerly colonized countries, on the other hand,
sustained underdevelopment and poverty creation among those countries
inevitable. </p>



<p>Third, the <em>world-systems theory</em> expands from the <em>dependency
theory</em> and implies that “globalization may be conceptualized as a system of
nations placed in the core, semi-periphery, and periphery of an interconnected
global economy.” (P.208) Still, many countries that are providing raw materials
remain in an unchanged economic status. Their cheap labor market and corrupt
officials do not contribute much to their country’s growth rather they deflate
it. But the core nations’ citizens involve more in the services industry such
as insurance, health care, and finance. Overall, all theories of globalization
inform that the core nations benefit more, but semi-periphery and periphery
nations benefit less or not at all.</p>



<p>Until the 1980s, many graduates from South India move to North-Indian
cities such as Delhi and Mumbai for jobs. When two times former Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh introduced a bill in the early 1990s (He was Finance Minister at
that time), which encouraged foreign direct investment and the situation is
started to change in Southern India. Especially, South Indian cities Bangalore,
Chennai, and Hyderabad benefited more. These cities attracted many
multinational companies and became IT and automobile hubs of India. They
started to attract people from all parts of India and abroad. Without any
surprise, fifty percent of Bangalore’s current population consists of migrants.
And it is a similar story on the other two cities Chennai and Hyderabad. In
other words, globalization made an impact and brought cultural diversity
whether these cities choose it not.&nbsp; </p>



<p>Netflix, Amazon, Prime, IMAX theatres, Spotify, Apple TV, Uber, and
CrossFit are global brands now. They have no boundaries. The e-commerce giant
Amazon makes a product available for an Indian to buy from the USA and vice
versa. Many Hollywood movies release on the same day as it releases in the USA,
noticeably, they release a day before in places like Singapore due to the
advanced time zone. Movie critics fly to Singapore or Tokyo to get hold of a
new movie review a day earlier. American food chains such as KFC, Burger King,
McDonald, Domino, Pizza hut and Starbucks are becoming local Bangalorean
landmarks. Now, for a young American moving to Bangalore from San Francisco won’t
be a difficult situation as it was two decades back. He/She can still watch her
favorite entertainment channels, almost experience the same food, commute using
Uber and importantly no need to learn a new language. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" src="https://cjselvamani.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/globalization-culture-changing.png" alt="Globalization and Changing Culture" class="wp-image-291"/></figure>



<p>So far, I was talking about Metropolitan life. Yes, globalization did a
humongous impact on Indian megacities. No further arguments required to prove
it. What about rural areas? Last summer, as per SAIACS requirements four of us
went on a mission trip in Bihar for the intercultural experience. We were
involved with a missionary organization called GEMS-Bihar and their main focus
is on unreached rural areas. Many villages do not have a proper road and
electricity, but their hospitality was amazing. In the end, we had a surprise
waiting for us. There was a common practice, after serving food we were given
sweets with tea and a glass of beverage Sprite (a Coca-Cola owned beverage).
Coca-Cola knows the way how to reach people’s houses where there is no proper
road connection, electricity, and no gospel message proclaimed so far. When
does serving Sprite become part of their culture? Many of them can’t read and
write their local language and this carbonized sugary water somehow became part
of their household. Initially, we doubted that the villagers are only bringing
sprite since they know we are coming from Bangalore but later we realized that
it was not the case as we assumed. </p>



<p>There is a scenario situates in the global arena if some countries do
not want them to identify or take part in the globalization system then those
countries seen as aliens to globalization or one world community. But India is
part of the global community and somehow it affects or changes or preserves or
protects the Indian culture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Missiological Implications and Practical
Applications</strong></h2>



<p>I am an intern with a local church, and I can see the diversity in our
church, especially among youths. There is a common element among them is that
they call themselves a Bangalorean, but most of their parents are migrants from
different parts of India and some are from overseas countries. Moreover,
Bangalore is the number one destination for students to pursue higher education
in India and for many West-African nationals. So, our young adult group
consists of peoples from various backgrounds. One end it makes the Great
Commission simpler as we don’t want to go to nations to make disciples, but the
nations are coming to us. On the other end, the approach to evangelism becomes
more complexed. As we are experiencing today that one method cannot be applied
to all students. In our church, we call it a Bangalorean formula. Usually, our
youth ministry team spend one-to-one time with students if they are non-Christians.
It helps to understand their cultural beliefs, values, practices, and so on.
The openness showed by us to know them better generally gets appreciated by
them.</p>



<p>Second, associating the Church with concerns such as social justice, human rights, environment/creation care and so on is paving a way to establish His kingdom wider. As Mother Teresa insisted “Christians have a responsibility to reject unsustainably consumptive lifestyles and a growth-oriented economic model in favor of simple and sustainable living.” (P.219) In contrast, contemporary globalization contributed to technological growth and economic growth. The global media plays an important role to spread the good news of the gospel throughout the world. Many believers debate that the Church must play a leading role to make use of the growing multimedia rather than undermining it.</p>



<p>Third, “globalization is not ending, it’s changing” and it regularly
alters the culture too. It forces the need for contextual churches. The gospel
needs to be interpreted in a way it reaches and makes sense to Urbanites. Also,
providing practical implications on how Christians keep their practice not only
inside the walls of the church also outside the walls of the church while still
partaking in business and finance, the world of the arts and theatre, learning
and scholarship, and the public and government structure. Finally, Christians “must
ask difficult questions and be willing to make changes where appropriate and
anthropology contributes insight into how globalization affects people and
their way of life.” (P.220)</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bibliography</h2>



<p>&#8220;Introducing Cultural Anthropology: A Christian Perspective.&#8221; Brian M. Howell and Jenell Williams Paris, 2011, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, Pp. 25-42, 203-220</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
